Tag Archives: Strata fees

Buying: Apartment v House

AptVHouse

When I bought my first property I looked at both apartments and houses. As a single girl at the time an apartment seemed like the obvious choice, and one I initially thought was a given, but I ended up buying a house. Many factors determine the type of property you buy; not just the size, location or price.

The “White Picket Fence” Syndrome

Apartments tend to be cheaper. A three bedroom garden flat can be afforded by a small family but a three bedroom house in the same street usually commands a higher premium. People love the dream of owning their own piece of land, and this creates a higher demand for houses. Apartments are also cheaper because on that same piece of land you can build multiple apartments instead of just one house.

Apartment 1 : House 0

But on the flip side…

Because houses have more perceived value than apartments their value also tends to increase more over the same period of time. Even if houses and apartments both increased 10% in five years, due to the generally higher price of houses, a $500k two bedroom house will increase in value by $50k, whereas a $420k two bedroom apartment will only make you a gain of $42k.

However there are all different types of apartments. An apartment in a high rise amongst many apartment high-rise buildings tends to increase less in value comparatively simply because the supply of apartments in that area is large. However if you buy a beautifully converted warehouse apartment in a small block in an area with a lot of houses, you should see values increase healthily. Look for apartments with good bones and uniqueness.

Apartment 1 : House 1

Size does matter

Generally speaking apartments tend to be smaller dwellings than houses. Its easy to find one bedroom apartments and five bedroom houses but the reverse doesn’t apply. However a small family can happily live in a ground floor apartment with a garden as equally as an older couple can continue to live in their large family home long since vacated by the kids. Depending on your space requirements will generally lean you towards one type of property over another. However it’s important to consider how long you intend to live in the property and whether the size will continue to support your lifestyle.

Apartment 1 : House 1

Do I own the land downunder?

Owning an apartment technically means you own a dwelling but not the land. Apartments are sold under Strata title, which allows individual ownership of part of a property (e.g. the apartment), combined with shared ownership in the remainder (called ‘Common Property’ e.g. foyers, driveways, gardens) through a legal entity called the owners corporation.

Houses are usually sold under Torrens title, which registers the owner’s claim on the land and therefore everything on it.

Apartment 1 : House 2

Hidden costs

Strata ownership for apartments requires the payment of fees and levies to collectively maintain, insure and improve the building and common property. Strata fees can be quite high depending on how many facilities the building has (e.g. lifts, pool, concierge). Levies and special levies can be shockingly high depending on what work needs to be done to the building and common areas. A leaking roof in an apartment building can result in a surprise levy bill for tens of thousands of dollars per apartment.

However owning a house is no free ride either. When the roof needs repairing on your house, guess who foots the whole bill? And ongoing maintenance such as replacing carpet or fixing an old fence occurs more often than you’d like to admit. In addition, houses have regular costs such as building insurance, water rates and land tax (on investment properties), that you don’t pay owning an apartment. You have more control over when some of these costs are incurred with a house but generally you can’t avoid them forever.

Apartment 1 : House 2

Meet the neighbours

With apartments, because you share title in the building with the other apartment owners, coming to a collective decision on how the building is managed or what the fee and levy money is spent on can be challenging to say the least. Horror stories of Owners Corporation meetings are many!

In addition, apartment living means sharing walls, floors and ceilings with your neighbours and because of this your neighbours can determine how you live your life to an extent. Strata Laws can prohibit pets, the apartment below can reject your request to install wooden floors due to added noise, restrictions on structural renovations can prove infuriating, and don’t even think of hanging washing on your balcony! This can prove extremely frustrating and in extreme cases unbearable.

However houses have neighbours too. Planning permission for renovations still needs to be advised to neighbours, who can object. Often your house will share a party wall or fence with a neighbour, which needs to be co-maintained. And certainly in the case of terrace houses, noisy neighbours are as close as any apartment. But owning a house you generally only need to appease your bordering neighbours, and certainly no-one can prohibit you from having pets!

Apartment 1 : House 3

High maintenance

When you own a house you have to organize all of the ongoing maintenance, or if you’re handy or thrifty, do it yourself (eek!). This can take a lot of time whether you do it yourself or outsource, and dealing with tradespeople is often fraught with trauma (see previous post). Whereas the owners corporation for an apartment building will manage maintenance for the building and common spaces, and apartments themselves tend to have little to no gardens and smaller floor space, requiring minimal maintenance.

We moved from a lovely apartment to a house a few years ago and I seriously took for granted how low maintenance the apartment was. No lawn to mow (even the 5m x 1m strip at the house takes time to mow!), no paving to top up with sand, no garden lighting that requires fixing because the rain has snuck into the electrics, no fence to repaint because the rust is starting to show… a good part of every weekend is spent doing “house stuff”.

Apartment 2 : House 3

Security

You cannot compare the security of a 6th floor apartment in a building with multiple key fob security doors and lift access to a house, even with a burglar alarm. Whether it is psychological or not, I felt safer and thought my stuff was safer up in that apartment rather than in my house. There’s something about the lack of access from the street, more people around and generally better security systems that mean apartments tend to be more secure.

In addition to being low maintenance, apartments are generally easier and safer to lock up and leave vacant for a while, such as for long holidays or a pied-a-terre.

There were reports of “spidermen” burglars scaling high-rise apartment blocks on the Gold Coast years ago but lets assume the risk of death generally outweighs the value of a plasma TV strapped to your back.

Apartment 3 : House 3

Scope for Improvement

The clincher for me comes down to the fact that I can add a bedroom to a house but not an apartment. Whether your motivation is capital gain or more space, houses have potential for extension or complete rebuild to something amazing and worth much more than the original property. You can only really do cosmetic renovations to an apartment and I’d be careful on overcapitalizing. The scope to significantly improve a house is worth a lot. Whether you do the extension or simply sell it on, that potential has value, something you can never achieve with an apartment.

Apartment 3 : House 4

So there we have it. Houses win, but only just. I think the true tipping point is the lifestyle factors, and of course, how much is in your budget! I ended up buying a house because I wanted to hold the property for at least 10 years for the capital gain and I knew in that timeframe I would (hopefully!) be having kids so needed more bedrooms and outdoor space. It turned out to be the right choice for me.

Yay the auction results have returned!

Slide1

I am a devout reader of the Saturday auction results in the newspaper. If you don’t know what I’m talking about, get yourself hooked here. There are no auctions over the quiet Christmas and January period while lots of people are away. Understandable but it is torture to me who literally considers the auction results property porn!

I love trawling the results; passing opinion on whether I think properties sold for too much or were a bargain, pouring over floor plans looking for capital growth opportunities, or just ogling those sort of properties I can’t yet afford!

I scroll down the list looking at suburbs I am interested in, or even ones I haven’t heard of and wondering where they are. The results only list the type of property (h = house, t = terrace, u = unit, etc) and number of bedrooms… I do wish it included number of bathrooms and carspaces too.

Sometimes the price is published and sometimes it isn’t. If it isn’t, sometimes if you click on the link to the property it will display the price in the ad. Sometimes if you click on a similar property advertised and scroll down to the bottom of the page to similar sale results, it may be listed, although sometimes you have to wait a few weeks.

And then excitingly it tells you how the property sold; A = auction, S = Sold and then you get the exciting outcomes such as W = withdrawn (i.e. the vendors changed their mind, or there were no interested parties in buying), PI = Passed In (i.e. it didn’t sell at auction because the bidding was not high enough), and so on.

I find a few properties I am intrigued by and click into their ad for further details. I first look at the floor plan, deciding how liveable the property is and whether there is scope for improvement. If its a house I then consider the land size and the width of the house, as terraces in particular can be very narrow, under 4m is claustraphobic in my opinion! If its a unit I always check the facilities and strata fees to see if they are reasonable, which is a discussion in itself. And then I look at the pictures, but am always wary of those properties furnished with rental furniture. I know it helps some people visualise the space but I think it just looks like mutton dressed as lamb.

This week is a bit light on but I did find one property I was intrigued by… Leichhardt is a great inner west suburb, family friendly, close to the city with good public transport, with a lovely community and Italian influence. When I was looking to buy my house over five years ago, I always thought Leichhardt still had a lot of value. However I think that ship has sailed! This 2 bedroom, 2 bathroom 1 carspace workers cottage sold for $1.075 mio, which is Paddington prices (although you wouldn’t get the extra bathroom and carspace!). A closer look shows the block to be very narrow and long – sure you could extend but you’d end up with a lot of hallways and even narrower rooms. It has been renovated nicely and has great storage in the lower ground level, but who would buy this house? A couple not looking to have kids, downsizers…? It’s a hell of a lot of money for not much.

What other properties did you find interesting in this week’s auction results?

Gearing: understanding the buzzword

97

Gearing relates to how you structure the financial position on an investment property (or any income producing asset). You can be positively, neutral or negatively geared.

I have a friend who has some big ideas on property, some of which are great and others I question whether he is regurgitating buzzwords without necessarily understanding what they mean. My friend wants to buy an investment property and negatively gear it, but what he hasn’t considered is that negative gearing requires a cash outflow on his part, and when he isn’t in a surplus cash position to start with this could be a financial burden. “Negative Gearing” is a big tax buzzword but for most normal people it can live up to it’s name and just be… negative.

Negative Gearing

Negative gearing is where expenses outweigh income. For example, you own an apartment with a mortgage that you rent out. Typical expenses would be, for example:

$    1,200 / mth mortgage payments (assume interest only)

$     800 / qtr strata fees

$    1,000 / yr council rates and water bills

$     500 / yr occasional repairs and maintenance

$     300 / yr rental agency fees

$19,400 annual expenses

You receive rent of $350 per week, which is $18,200 of annual income. Therefore the property costs you a loss of $1,200 per year. This means you have to spend $1,200 of your own cash each year on this property.

There are two main reasons why people chose to negatively gear:

  1. They are high-income earners who are looking for a tax deduction. The cash outlay of $1,200 will be used to offset against their income to lower their tax obligations. For the highest earning tax bracket this means they will receive a credit against their tax of $588 but the net effect is they still need to outlay $612 cash against the property. Great for someone who has lots of cash.
  1. They are hoping that the capital gain on the property will outweigh the costs of negatively gearing it. For instance, the apartment cost you $380k to buy and if you sell in three years time for $430k, less stamp duty, selling agency fees etc you have made a gain of approx $20k, of which you can keep just over half after paying your tax bill, which means for $1,836 cash outlay, you have made a net gain of $8,164 (which is not a great return, but that’s for another post!).

All good reasons to negatively gear, but if you don’t have surplus cash, are not on a high tax rate and/or expect some capital growth in the property regardless, negative gearing might not be for you.

Neutral Gearing

This is where you manage the expenses and income of the property to effectively net out to zero.

I have chosen this option in the past because I wanted my investment property to just “pay for itself” while it grew in value.

Positive Gearing

This is where you want to earn an income from your property. Great if you don’t earn a salary, i.e. you’re a non-working parent, or you are retired and are living off your assets.

This is where the rental income on the property is greater than the expenses. You may pay tax on the net income earned (depending on your overall tax position), but you will be receiving income and therefore a cash inflow.

Before I went on maternity leave I prepaid a year of mortgage repayments on the investment loan on my mortgage to bring forward greater expenses in the year I was still earning a wage (i.e. the property was negatively geared in that year). The year I wasn’t earning an income while on maternity leave my property was positively geared, which provided a small but helpful income. So you can change your gearing depending on your situation.

So please don’t get caught up in buzzwords like “negative gearing” without fully understanding what they mean to you. If anyone has any other buzzwords they would like clarification on, please include in the comments below…