Gearing relates to how you structure the financial position on an investment property (or any income producing asset). You can be positively, neutral or negatively geared.
I have a friend who has some big ideas on property, some of which are great and others I question whether he is regurgitating buzzwords without necessarily understanding what they mean. My friend wants to buy an investment property and negatively gear it, but what he hasn’t considered is that negative gearing requires a cash outflow on his part, and when he isn’t in a surplus cash position to start with this could be a financial burden. “Negative Gearing” is a big tax buzzword but for most normal people it can live up to it’s name and just be… negative.
Negative Gearing
Negative gearing is where expenses outweigh income. For example, you own an apartment with a mortgage that you rent out. Typical expenses would be, for example:
$ 1,200 / mth mortgage payments (assume interest only)
$ 800 / qtr strata fees
$ 1,000 / yr council rates and water bills
$ 500 / yr occasional repairs and maintenance
$ 300 / yr rental agency fees
$19,400 annual expenses
You receive rent of $350 per week, which is $18,200 of annual income. Therefore the property costs you a loss of $1,200 per year. This means you have to spend $1,200 of your own cash each year on this property.
There are two main reasons why people chose to negatively gear:
- They are high-income earners who are looking for a tax deduction. The cash outlay of $1,200 will be used to offset against their income to lower their tax obligations. For the highest earning tax bracket this means they will receive a credit against their tax of $588 but the net effect is they still need to outlay $612 cash against the property. Great for someone who has lots of cash.
- They are hoping that the capital gain on the property will outweigh the costs of negatively gearing it. For instance, the apartment cost you $380k to buy and if you sell in three years time for $430k, less stamp duty, selling agency fees etc you have made a gain of approx $20k, of which you can keep just over half after paying your tax bill, which means for $1,836 cash outlay, you have made a net gain of $8,164 (which is not a great return, but that’s for another post!).
All good reasons to negatively gear, but if you don’t have surplus cash, are not on a high tax rate and/or expect some capital growth in the property regardless, negative gearing might not be for you.
Neutral Gearing
This is where you manage the expenses and income of the property to effectively net out to zero.
I have chosen this option in the past because I wanted my investment property to just “pay for itself” while it grew in value.
Positive Gearing
This is where you want to earn an income from your property. Great if you don’t earn a salary, i.e. you’re a non-working parent, or you are retired and are living off your assets.
This is where the rental income on the property is greater than the expenses. You may pay tax on the net income earned (depending on your overall tax position), but you will be receiving income and therefore a cash inflow.
Before I went on maternity leave I prepaid a year of mortgage repayments on the investment loan on my mortgage to bring forward greater expenses in the year I was still earning a wage (i.e. the property was negatively geared in that year). The year I wasn’t earning an income while on maternity leave my property was positively geared, which provided a small but helpful income. So you can change your gearing depending on your situation.
So please don’t get caught up in buzzwords like “negative gearing” without fully understanding what they mean to you. If anyone has any other buzzwords they would like clarification on, please include in the comments below…

